Emissions Worldview
BY BILL SIURU, PHD, PE
The guided-missile destroyer
USS McCampbell receives
fuel from the replenishment
oiler USNS Pecos during a re-
fueling at sea. (U.S. Navy
photo by Mass Communi-
cation Specialist 2nd Class
Byron C. Linder.)
Greener Navy to Sail, and
Fly, on Alternative Fuels
The Secretary of the U.S. Navy, Ray
Mabus, recently outlined the Navy’s
future energy plans. This includes the
overall goal of obtaining half of the total
energy consumption for ships, aircraft,
tanks, vehicles and shore installations
from alternative sources by 2020.
While the cost of fuel is important,
the strategic implications of depending
on petroleum that comes from unfriendly countries is perhaps even more
critical. Like all of the federal government, the military is required to reduce
its carbon footprint and combat global
climate change. Indeed, the Department of Defense is leading the rest of
the U.S. government when it comes to
the development of clean and renewable energy sources.
In addition to many conservation-oriented efforts to reduce fuel usage,
there are several alternative fuel programs aimed at using both biofuels and
synthetic fuels. For example, by 2011
Bill Siuru, PhD, PE, is a technical writer based
in Temecula, California, U.S.A.
the U.S. Air Force intends to certify
every aircraft in its inventory for alternative fuels, namely a 50/50 blend of
JP- 8 and Syntroleum’s FT fuel. It has
already certified or is currently certifying the B- 52, C- 17 and B-1B on this
alternative fuel. “FT” stand for the
Fischer-Tropsch process used to produce the synthetic fuel.
The Navy also has a major alternative
fuels program to develop biofuel alternatives for its F-76 ship propulsion fuel
that is used for shipboard boilers, gas
turbines and diesel engines, as well as
JP- 5 aircraft fuel. JP- 5 is essentially the
same as JP- 8, the U.S. military’s standard fuel used in everything from aircraft and helicopters to trucks and
tanks, however, JP- 5 has a substantially
higher flash point, which is needed for
safety reasons aboard ships.
The Navy is requiring alternative fuels
to be the same as F-76 or JP- 5, that is a
drop-in replacement. They would be
used in 50-50 blends with conventional
petroleum-derived fuel in order to meet
specifications. Secondly, feedstocks for
the fuels should not have to compete
with their use for food or interfere with
valuable land or water resources. Be-
cause a huge amount of fuel is con-
sumed in just transporting military fuel
worldwide, the military is interested in
alternative fuels that could be produced
close to where they are consumed.